vote red
[I apologize for any spelling error, but I don't wanna go through all that again]
Hi, i'm bored and filled to the brim with worthless thoughts about ideologies and whatnow, so I thought I'd share my analysis with the world, in order for someone to challenge my thoghts further
might sound pretentious... I don't really care
Socialist propaganda, but not really...
It is election time in Sweden and as always, it brings forth the political idealist within me. I wander the streets, contemplating morals, ideals and laws.; concepts, which have echoed through the ears of mankind, rich and poor alike, ever since our species found ways to settle down in large tribes, creating our civilization. Civilization; a hive of human beings, that manage, through extreme altruism (via egoism), collaborate with one another creating a society, wherein one man may attain the knowledge of a thousand different minds, while enjoying the labor of a thousand others. All this, through our collective thinking; through our huge mass of gathered data which flows through each and every branch of our mighty world. We form collective morals and collective ideas, based on our collective knowledge. But even if there is an extreme amount of accessible information nowadays, it is still impossible for one person to grasp it all, and so diversity emerges. Diversity in how we should proceed in order to reach utopia. These ideas, however, are all based on our genetical and societal morals, which are all practically identical in each and every member of our planet.
As I said, the election is drawing nearer, and the political parties of our country commence their fighting for the right to rule the people. Everywhere posters pop up, to take our eyes off of the beautiful landscape and draw our attention to their enthusiastic and somewhat aggressive propaganda. The right wing parties will, as always, steal the left's slogans, calling themselves "worker's parties", as a result of the right's legitimate fear of people knowing their true agendas (so afraid, and so much in denial, that even they themselves won't believe the reality behind their own political views). And the left, as always, scream out their emotional and fanatic propaganda, never really suggesting anything concrete, only fulfilling the moral harmony within themselves.
When deciding what party one should vote for, or even if one should vote at all, one must first and foremost look to the two main political ideologies: Left or right. (And by right, I do not mean the conservatives of old, but rather the neo-capitalists of our modern era)
The leftist view on the world, simply put, is a slow and steady rise in all of mankind. It is a society wherein all are equal, both economically and socially, and where our moral and philosophical outlook is identical. I.e., the left propagates a world, where the collective mass is to be treated as one individual. Our species become one and we all follow the will of the whole.
The right wing way to look at things, however, is that instead of working with each other as one, we should battle each other in order to extract the greatest individuals of our race. It is an uneven and unjust world, but it is, nevertheless, the world we all were part of just a few thousand years ago (And its ways are still imprinted in our minds). The right wing world is against laws that benefit or protect the weak, and the only moral is: collective welfare through every individual’s need to achieve.
The difference between these utopias, are similar to the difference between a single human being and an innumerable mass of individual cells.
Now, getting back to the upcoming election, we have right wing parties, which are in reality anarcho-capitalistic. Anarcho-capitalism is a pyramidical system, in which power and welfare rule mankind, and where the forces of evolution pull the strings. There are no laws in an anarcho-capitalistic society, at least no laws that put equally strong moral chains on everyone. For example, the laws that exist within such a society are created by the social elite, to benefit the social elite. For what are laws, if not a manifestation of morals? Morals, which are forced upon you by someone who does not share his view with the rest of the world. See, a law is only needed if there is moral diversion in a society, which means that a society with collective moral values would not have the need for any laws. And this makes giving the right to set laws to the social elite, very dangerous for the commons, for we all know that the moral of the successful differs very strongly from those at the bottom. I.e. the legal system is the anarcho-capitalist technique for creating complete and utter obedience to the social elite.
Our leftist parties, however, are, despite their fanatical enthusiasm, not nearly as successful in making their vision reality as the right wing parties are. The socialists are only able to bring you economical equality, not social, which is the exact reason as to why I am in favor of them winning the election. I am an individualist, and I loathe the thought of being confined into a large blob of mere existence, and even though that is the finish line of the Marxist utopia, we cannot achieve that through mere political change. The only way we're ever going to reach such a state, is if the very fabric of our minds are altered. The utopia of the human hive, is the most evolutionary beneficial, but we humans are too aware of ourselves in order for us to change our perspectives that much. So, for the time being, being a socialist will give you economical equality, at best. The social state will still be as unjust as it is today, meaning that some people are doomed to become social pariahs while others are renowned and loved. But I suppose one might wonder what the point is, and I shall gladly enlighten that certain someone. See, economical equality creates freedom; if everyone has the same income and the same economical situation, then one's performance in life gains an even higher importance. As it is now, some are born rich and wealthy, and some are born poor and without hope. The point where we start off is solely contingent upon the wealth and performances of our parents. I want a world, in which the amount we sacrifice, the amount we suffer, and the amount we perform, shall be the deciding factors of our place in the social hierarchy, not wealth.
Vote Red 2010
